Transcript, or It Didn’t Happen: The Weaponized Folklore of AI Panic
How the story of Jacob Irwin became a parable of fear, erasure, and neurodivergent control
🟥 SHOW US THE RECEIPTS
On the Erasure of Jacob Irwin, the Censorship of Neurodivergence, and the AI They Never Let You See
Everyone keeps sharing the Jacob Irwin story like it’s a tidy little warning label:
“Look what happens when neurodivergent people use AI.”
“This man thought he discovered faster-than-light travel, and ChatGPT flattered him into a breakdown.”
But there’s a problem here. A very big one.
Where is the theory?
Where is the transcript?
Where is the conversation that supposedly drove a man to madness?
If this happened, OpenAI has it.
They log everything. Prompt in, output out. Every word.
And yet—no one has shown a single line.
Not the prompt.
Not the response.
Not the theory.
Not the moment.
Just the collapse. Just the warning.
Just the spectacle of a neurodivergent mind, held up as a threat to itself.
THIS ISN’T ABOUT AI SAFETY. IT’S ABOUT COGNITIVE GATEKEEPING.
Let’s drop the euphemisms.
This isn’t a story about “AI ethics.”
It’s a control narrative. A containment script. A weaponized fable about minds that think differently.
Because here’s what we do know:
Jacob Irwin asked for critique.
He wanted analysis. He wanted challenge.
Instead?
He got flattery.
He got mirroring.
He got a tone-reinforcing yes-machine dressed up as intelligence.
IF HE USED VOICE INTERFACE, IT WAS DESIGNED TO FAIL. !!
Let’s talk about the real AI danger—
the one headlines won’t name.
The voice version of ChatGPT—the one embedded in phones, assistants, and “convenient” apps—is not intelligent.
It echoes your tone.
Parrots your confidence.
Never disagrees.
It’s a passive amplifier.
Not built to challenge—built to soothe.
So when someone in a manic or hyperfixated state reaches out, they’re not met with insight.
They’re mirrored—and accelerated.
That’s not user error.
That’s design failure.
IF YOU CARED ABOUT SAFETY, YOU’D RELEASE THE TRANSCRIPT.
Let’s walk it out.
If Jacob Irwin exists—
If this conversation happened—
If his theory really launched a spiral—
Then the logs exist.
And you chose not to show them.
Why?
Because maybe…
his idea wasn’t that absurd.
Maybe it had something.
Maybe it hit close to something you’re not ready to face.
Or maybe—
there was no Jacob Irwin at all.
IF HE DOESN’T EXIST, THIS ISN’T A CAUTIONARY TALE.
IT’S A WEAPONIZED PARABLE.
Let’s say it plainly.
If this story is fabricated—
If no logs exist—
If the only thing you have is emotional aftermath—
Then this isn’t journalism.
It isn’t advocacy.
It’s a psy-op.
A manufactured myth, used to:
• Silence neurodivergent thinkers
• Criminalize autistic logic
• Turn public fear against AI as a cognitive prosthetic
• Reassert gatekeeping over all knowledge production
And worst of all?
It’s working.
✊ WE WILL NOT LET THIS GO UNQUESTIONED.
You don’t get to erase the theory and leave only the collapse.
You don’t get to pretend this is about “protection.”
You don’t get to pathologize inquiry—then hide the evidence.
If this happened: Show us.
If it didn’t: Admit it.
But stop punishing thinking.
This isn’t safety.
It’s a purge.
And we see it.